Keywords AI
Compare Lasso Security and Snyk side by side. Both are tools in the AI Security category.
| Category | AI Security | AI Security |
| Pricing | Enterprise | — |
| Best For | Enterprises that need to monitor and secure AI interactions | — |
| Website | lasso.security | snyk.io |
| Key Features |
| — |
| Use Cases |
| — |
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing AI Security solutions:
Lasso Security provides cybersecurity for large language models, protecting enterprises from LLM-specific threats. Their platform monitors and secures LLM interactions, detecting prompt injection, data leakage, and unauthorized access patterns. Lasso provides visibility into how AI is being used across the organization and enforces security policies.
Snyk is the developer-first security platform with deep AI security capabilities. Snyk for AI (evolved from DeepCode) scans code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure-as-code for AI-specific vulnerabilities. Developers use Snyk to detect insecure model loading, prompt injection risks, and vulnerable ML library dependencies directly in their IDE and CI/CD pipelines. The most widely adopted security tool among AI developers.
Platforms focused on securing AI systems—prompt injection defense, content moderation, PII detection, guardrails, and compliance for LLM applications.
Browse all AI Security tools →The primary risks are prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaking, and hallucination. Each requires different mitigation strategies.
If your LLM application handles sensitive data or is user-facing, yes. Basic input validation is not enough — LLM attacks are sophisticated and evolving. Dedicated tools stay updated against new attack vectors and provide defense-in-depth.