Keywords AI
Compare Lasso Security and Pangea side by side. Both are tools in the AI Security category.
| Category | AI Security | AI Security |
| Pricing | Enterprise | — |
| Best For | Enterprises that need to monitor and secure AI interactions | — |
| Website | lasso.security | pangea.cloud |
| Key Features |
| — |
| Use Cases |
| — |
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing AI Security solutions:
Lasso Security provides cybersecurity for large language models, protecting enterprises from LLM-specific threats. Their platform monitors and secures LLM interactions, detecting prompt injection, data leakage, and unauthorized access patterns. Lasso provides visibility into how AI is being used across the organization and enforces security policies.
Pangea is the "Twilio for Security" — a set of composable security APIs that developers embed directly into AI applications. It provides audit logging, data redaction, embargo compliance, IP reputation, and domain intelligence as simple API calls. For AI apps, Pangea's Redact API strips PII from prompts, its AI Guard detects prompt injections, and its Audit API creates tamper-proof logs of all AI interactions.
Platforms focused on securing AI systems—prompt injection defense, content moderation, PII detection, guardrails, and compliance for LLM applications.
Browse all AI Security tools →The primary risks are prompt injection, data leakage, jailbreaking, and hallucination. Each requires different mitigation strategies.
If your LLM application handles sensitive data or is user-facing, yes. Basic input validation is not enough — LLM attacks are sophisticated and evolving. Dedicated tools stay updated against new attack vectors and provide defense-in-depth.