Keywords AI
Confident AI vs Weights & Biases
Compare Confident AI and Weights & Biases side by side. Both are tools in the Observability, Prompts & Evals category.
Quick Comparison
| Category | Observability, Prompts & Evals | Observability, Prompts & Evals |
| Pricing | Open Source | Freemium |
| Best For | Developers who want to add automated LLM evaluation testing to their CI/CD pipeline | ML engineers and researchers who need comprehensive experiment tracking |
| Website | confident-ai.com | wandb.ai |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
When to Choose Confident AI vs Weights & Biases
- Unit testing LLM applications
- Automated evaluation in CI/CD pipelines
- Benchmarking across model versions
- ML experiment tracking and comparison
- Model training run management
- Team collaboration on ML projects
About Confident AI
Confident AI develops DeepEval, the most popular open-source LLM evaluation framework. DeepEval provides 14+ evaluation metrics including faithfulness, answer relevancy, contextual recall, and hallucination detection. The Confident AI platform adds collaboration features, regression testing, and continuous evaluation in CI/CD pipelines.
About Weights & Biases
Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading experiment tracking and ML operations platform, now extended to LLM applications. W&B Traces provides observability for LLM pipelines, while W&B Weave offers evaluation and production monitoring. The platform also supports model training tracking, hyperparameter sweeps, and artifact management, making it a comprehensive MLOps solution.
What is Observability, Prompts & Evals?
Tools for monitoring LLM applications in production, managing and versioning prompts, and evaluating model outputs. Includes tracing, logging, cost tracking, prompt engineering platforms, automated evaluation frameworks, and human annotation workflows.
Browse all Observability, Prompts & Evals tools →