Keywords AI
Want to supercharge your startup with AI? Here's how to get the most out of LLMs without breaking the bank:
To get the most out of LLMs in your startup, you need to track their performance. Here are the key metrics to watch:
Speed
How fast does your LLM respond? This is crucial for user experience. Slow responses = frustrated users.
Output Volume
This measures how much content your LLM can produce. It's vital for tasks like content creation or customer support.
Accuracy
Is your LLM giving correct answers? This builds user trust.
Metric | Measures | Why It's Important |
---|---|---|
Answer Relevancy | Does it address the input? | Ensures useful responses |
Correctness | Is it factually correct? | Builds trust |
Hallucination | Does it make stuff up? | Prevents misinformation |
Task-Specific Metrics
You might need custom metrics depending on your LLM's use. For summarization, you'd check how well it captures key points. Learn how to create custom evaluations here.
Responsible Metrics
These check for bias or toxic content in LLM outputs. It's about keeping your AI ethical.
Why track all this? It helps you spot problems early and improve your LLM. The metrics you focus on depend on your LLM's purpose. A chatbot might prioritize speed and relevancy, while a content generator might focus on output volume and accuracy.
Choosing an LLM for your startup isn't just about grabbing the hottest or cheapest option. You need to match the model to your specific needs.
LLMs have different strengths. Some are all-rounders, others are specialists.
What does your startup NEED? A Swiss Army knife or a laser-focused tool?
LLMs can burn through cash fast. Here's a quick price comparison:
Model | Price |
---|---|
GPT-4o | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
o1-preview | $15.00 / 1M input tokens, $60.00 / 1M output tokens |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $3.00 / 1M input tokens, $15.00 / 1M output tokens |
Gemini 1.5 Pro | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
Cohere Command R+ | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
But remember: Cheaper isn't always better. A pricier model might save you money if it's more accurate or efficient.
Can you plug it in and go? Look at:
Key metrics to watch:
For chat apps, aim for under 200ms to first token. Users hate waiting.
Want great results from LLMs? It's all about the prompts. Here's how to craft them:
Vague prompts = vague outputs. Instead of "What's a good marketing strategy?", try:
"Create a social media plan for a SaaS startup targeting small businesses. Include content ideas for Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, posting frequency, and 3 campaign concepts."
"You're a financial advisor helping a 35-year-old software engineer with $50k in savings. Recommend an investment strategy for a house down payment in 5 years."
Show, don’t just tell. Few-shot example:
"Rewrite these sentences to be more engaging:
"Create a product description for our new project management software. Structure:
Headline:
One-sentence summary:
Key features (bullet points):
Pricing:
Call to action:"
Not getting what you need? Tweak your prompts. Adjust wording, add context, or break tasks into smaller steps.
Use a prompt management tool to collaborate and iterate more easily.
RAG is a big deal for startups wanting better LLMs. It mixes info retrieval with text generation, letting LLMs use external knowledge for more accurate answers.
RAG has two main steps:
Part | What It Does | Tips |
---|---|---|
Retrieval | Finds relevant data | Use smart search methods |
Augmentation | Adds context to prompts | Make sure added info fits |
Generation | Makes final output | Balance LLM skills and added data |
Caching is a game-changer for startups using LLMs. It’s like a cheat sheet for your AI, storing answers to questions it’s seen before.
Semantic caching is the smart upgrade—faster for similar questions.
Start here: LLM caching
Real-world win: Anthropic saw a 90% cost cut and 85% speed boost.
Keep it fresh: Update cache regularly to prevent outdated responses.
Off-the-shelf LLMs not cutting it? Time to customize.
Company | Model | Result |
---|---|---|
Med-PaLM 2 | 86.5% on US Medical Licensing Exam | |
Bloomberg | BloombergGPT | Top performance on financial tasks |
Method | Up-front Cost | Ongoing Cost |
---|---|---|
Prompt Engineering | Low | Low |
RAG | Medium | Medium |
Fine-Tuning | High | Low |
Tips:
They're helpful, but not the full picture:
To truly know your LLM:
"As LLMs become part of business workflows, making sure they’re reliable is crucial." – Anjali Chaudhary
Example: Dataherald saved money using tools like Helicone and LangSmith.
Bottom line: Benchmarks are a start. Ongoing checks and improvements are the key.