Keywords AI
Want to supercharge your startup with AI? Here's how to get the most out of LLMs without breaking the bank:
Key benefits:
To get the most out of LLMs in your startup, you need to track their performance. Here are the key metrics to watch:
Speed
How fast does your LLM respond? This is crucial for user experience. Slow responses = frustrated users.
Output Volume
This measures how much content your LLM can produce. It's vital for tasks like content creation or customer support.
Accuracy
Is your LLM giving correct answers? This builds user trust.
Metric | Measures | Why It's Important |
---|---|---|
Answer Relevancy | Does it address the input? | Ensures useful responses |
Correctness | Is it factually correct? | Builds trust |
Hallucination | Does it make stuff up? | Prevents misinformation |
Task-Specific Metrics
You might need custom metrics depending on your LLM's use. For summarization, you'd check how well it captures key points. Learn how to create custom evaluations here.
Responsible Metrics
These check for bias or toxic content in LLM outputs. It's about keeping your AI ethical.
Why track all this? It helps you spot problems early and improve your LLM. The metrics you focus on depend on your LLM's purpose. A chatbot might prioritize speed and relevancy, while a content generator might focus on output volume and accuracy.
Choosing an LLM for your startup isn't just about grabbing the hottest or cheapest option. You need to match the model to your specific needs.
Here's what to consider:
1. Abilities
LLMs have different strengths. Some are all-rounders, others are specialists.
What does your startup NEED? A Swiss Army knife or a laser-focused tool?
2. Cost
LLMs can burn through cash fast. Here's a quick price comparison:
Model | Price |
---|---|
GPT-4o | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
o1-preview | $15.00 / 1M input tokens, $60.00 / 1M output tokens |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $3.00 / 1M input tokens, $15.00 / 1M output tokens |
Gemini 1.5 pro | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
Cohere Command R+ | $2.50 / 1M input tokens, $10.00 / 1M output tokens |
But remember: Cheaper isn't always better. A pricier model might save you money if it's more accurate or efficient.
3. Ease of Use
Can you plug it in and go? Look at:
4. Performance
Key metrics to watch:
For chat apps, aim for under 200ms to first token. Users hate waiting.
Want great results from LLMs? It's all about the prompts. Here's how to craft them:
Be specific and clear
Vague prompts = vague outputs. Instead of "What's a good marketing strategy?", try:
"Create a social media plan for a SaaS startup targeting small businesses. Include content ideas for Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, posting frequency, and 3 campaign concepts."
Provide context
Give the LLM some background:
"You're a financial advisor helping a 35-year-old software engineer with $50k in savings. Recommend an investment strategy for a house down payment in 5 years."
Use examples
Show, don't just tell. Here's a few-shot learning prompt:
"Rewrite these sentences to be more engaging:
Break down complex tasks
For tricky problems, go step-by-step:
Use output primers
Guide the LLM to the format you want:
"Create a product description for our new project management software. Structure:
Headline: One-sentence summary: Key features (bullet points): Pricing: Call to action:"
Experiment and refine
Not getting what you need? Tweak your prompts. Adjust wording, add context, or break tasks into smaller steps.
Collaborate on prompts with the team
You can use a prompt management tool to collaborate on prompts with the team, which makes easier to iterate on prompt.
RAG is a big deal for startups wanting better LLMs. It mixes info retrieval with text generation, letting LLMs use external knowledge for more accurate answers.
Here's the lowdown on RAG:
RAG has two main steps:
This helps fix common LLM problems like outdated info and making stuff up.
Part | What It Does | Tips |
---|---|---|
Retrieval | Finds relevant data | Use smart search methods |
Augmentation | Adds context to prompts | Make sure added info fits |
Generation | Makes final output | Balance LLM skills and added data |
Caching is a game-changer for startups using LLMs. It's like a cheat sheet for your AI, storing answers to questions it's seen before.
Here's how caching boosts your LLM:
Caching cuts response times. One startup's query time dropped from 0.8 seconds to 0.0003 seconds. That's FAST.
Less processing = lower API costs. Some companies cut expenses by up to 90% with prompt caching.
Faster responses make users happy. Simple as that.
Semantic caching is the new kid on the block. It's smart - finding answers to similar, not just exact, questions. It's about 30% faster for small docs and 50% faster for big ones.
Getting Started with Caching
Check out LLM caching here.
Real-World Results
Anthropic's prompt caching helped customers cut costs by 90% and speed up long prompt responses by 85%.
Keep It Fresh
Update your cache regularly. Old data can lead to outdated responses. Set up a system to refresh your cache periodically or when new info arrives.
Off-the-shelf LLMs not cutting it? Let's talk about tailoring AI for your startup.
You might need a custom LLM if:
Fine-tuning is like giving your AI extra classes. Here's how:
Company | Model | Result |
---|---|---|
Med-PaLM 2 | 86.5% score on US Medical Licensing Exam questions | |
Bloomberg | BloombergGPT | Outperformed similar models on financial tasks |
Method | Up-front Cost | Ongoing Cost |
---|---|---|
Prompt Engineering | Low | Low |
RAG | Medium | Medium |
Fine-Tuning | High | Low |
LLM benchmarks are useful, but they're not perfect. Here's why:
To get a better picture:
Test the LLM on tasks specific to your business.
Don't just set it and forget it. Watch how the LLM does day-to-day.
New benchmarking methods pop up all the time. Keep learning.
"As LLMs become part of business workflows, making sure they're reliable is crucial." - Anjali Chaudhary, Engineer-turned-writer
Benchmarks are just one tool. Mix them with ongoing checks and tweaks for best results.
Take Dataherald. They cut LLM costs using tools like Helicone or LangSmith. These tools helped spot waste, leading to big savings.
Bottom line? Use benchmarks to start, but don't stop there. Keep testing and improving to make LLMs work for your startup.